Design a financial services Meta (Facebook) product.

  Meta
Add Your Answer
Answers (3)

Clarifying Question – is this product solving a problem for a particular type of Facebook user?

Is this for Facebook or its subsidiaries like WhatsApp and Instagram?

Assuming this is for Facebook and can be expanded in future to subsidiaries.

Also, assuming that Facebook does not have any financial services product (this is because right now it has Facebook Pay).

User Groups

The different user groups for Facebook

1.People who use it for entertainment and connecting with friends. They browse through content with the intent of keeping themselves busy or follow certain types of post. They may also share content with friends. Within these there can be users who use FB frequently vs those who use occasionally.

  1. People who use Facebook to sell something. These are professionals who have their own page and use it to promote their product or service or charity organisations (for donations). These can also include people renting out things like apartments or cars.
  2. People who use Facebook to search for rentals or to buy stuff. They are on the lookout for ads related to say room/PG rentals or for buying certain items from sellers.

Here I will focus on the first user group – People who use FB just to keep in touch with friends and browse content.

Pain points for user group

  1. When friends go out to dine or pay as a group, they don’t have the ability to split the amount equally and settle the balance.
  2. If you are having a conversation with a friend regarding lending money and you come to some agreement, then you need to open another app to actually transfer.
  3. No reminders to friends to pay you back.
  4. To pay any friend, you need to either add them as a bank beneficiary or ask them which payment app they use, not everyone uses one or the same one.

Use cases

  1. Enable people to transfer to their friends on Facebook without having to add any beneficiary.
  2. Provide the ability to send friendly reminders to pay.
  3. Ability to form a group who can split money and then settle.

Solutions

  1. Create a Facebook wallet for all users when they register. The user needs to enable the wallet to start using it.
  2. Security for the wallet. Proper registration and authorization for the wallet.
  3. Users can send money from one wallet to another in Facebook.
  4. When users create a group in Facebook (like a conversation group), then there they can add expenses for the group and split and settle using the Facebook wallet.
  5. Users can add or remove money from their wallets.
  6. An AI which when setup settles outstanding payments when scheduled. For example, if you don’t pay in a week, the bot will settle the payment. It also reminds users to recharge when balance in the account is low.

Evaluation

Solution Adoption or Impact or Importance Ease of implementation Priority
1 High High P0
2 High Medium P0
3 High Medium P0
4 Medium to high Medium to high P1
5 High High P0
6 High Low P1

I would start with implementation of P0. This would be the MVP and once this is rolled out, I will gauge the success through metrics listed below for a quarter. Based on this I will move to improvise and build further release cycles.

Future scope – this can be expanded to include Whatsapp and Instagram and contact across these. It can also be extended as a merchant payment system but the deign would have to vary. For now, I would like to keep payments only within Facebook users, but there is potential to link this to external sites as a payment gateway to the wallets.

Success metrics

  1. Number of people opting to register their wallets
  2. Adoption rate in the next quarter (growth rate)
  3. Number of transactions per user – daily/monthly metrics
  4. Number of complaints regarding security of wallet in the next quarter – are users having any leak in security by hackers.

Summary

To summarise, I am designing a payment solution for friends to quickly make payments to each other without the hassle of having to add beneficiaries and remind each other to make the payment.

Step 1. Clarify scope and goals: 

  • Do we have specific customer segment in mind? Assume No
  • Financial services is a very broad definition that includes transactional, credit, insurance products, etc, do we have anything particular in mind? Assume NO, just any financial product.
  • What is the goal: are we looking to launch a product that will generate its own revenue, or it could just help drive outcomes for other existing products? Assume, we are open to all options, as long as there is net positive impact for FB.
  • Do we have any resource constraints? Assume no constraints, as long as the product delivers value to our customers and FB business
  • When we say Facebook product, do we mean just Facebook itself, or also Instagram and WhatsApp potentially? No, assume just FB itself.
Step 2. List customer segments: 
  • Consumers – primary users of Facebook who enable the ad revenue monetization model
    • Power users – daily active users, those who use FB as their primary social network to engage with friends, post and consume content, etc.
    • Moderate users – monthly active users, who use FB one to several days a month, they either use it as one of the social networks or maybe they don’t use any social networks on daily basis.
    • Passive users – use FB less than once a month. Maybe they have some specific edge case for using FB, like engaging with their friends who live in different cities.
  • Advertisers – businesses who advertise on Facebook. Main sub-segments would be:
    • Small businesses
    • Medium
    • Large businesses
    • Agencies – advertise on behalf of their customers
In reality, especially for advertisers, the segmentation would be multi-dimensional – vertical, size of business, how much they rely on facebook (power user, etc), but the sake of simplicity we are looking at these 4 segments.
Out of these segments, I would like to focus on Advertisers, specifically small and medium businesses. Main reason behind choosing these segments is because small and medium businesses are much more underserved when it comes to financial services, while large business generally don’t have that problem. Agencies are intermediaries, so it is not optimal to target them with a new product, because we want to first validate customer need and our solution with customers that we have direct access to.
Step 3. List customer needs:

Before we jump into specific needs, lets start with the overarching goal. The goal of every company who advertises on Facebook is to get their target ROI on marketing campaigns (ratio of revenue generated by acquired customers to the cost of given campaign).  With respect to this goal, customers have the following specific needs:

  • Build their brand recognition
  • Acquire the right customers (right segment, LTV on par with what they have now or better, etc)
  • Adverise easier
  • Have funds available to pay for advertising
Step 4. Prioritize user needs
My assumption is that the first two needs: building brand and acquiring the right customers are already handled by FB customer success teams, and they are not directly relevant to a financial services product (at least on the surface level).
On the other hand, the goals of advertising easier and allocating money to pay for ads could be potentially address with a financial product, and obviously these goals are in line with our internal goal of increasing ad revenue (or at least sustaining it in the times of COVID).
Step 5. List alternatives and potential solutions
When it comes to alternatives, customers don’t have any satisfactory choices:
  • Take a loan from the bank – very long application process, many business do not qualify, low approval rates for those that qualify (especially in COVID times), high APR because the loan is general-purpose
  • Save on other non-advertising expenses (e.g. fire people) to free up some cash for FB ads
  • Save on advertising through other channels (e.g. google adwords) to free up some cash for FB ads
  • Take a loan from friends and family – it is awkward, you are not likely to raise the sum that you need, and strained relationships with friends and family are pretty much guaranteed in case of difficulties repaying the loan.

Based on the needs and alternatives, here are 3 potential solutions and their assessment according to RICE framework, slightly modified in that confidence now also includes internal risks (sorry for bullets, table behaved in a weird way)

Option 1. Advertise now, pay later: one-off payment delay. Customer repays the balance for a sizeable block of ads in the mid-term horizon, for example 3-6 months. This option is best for customers that have ultra long cycle of converting leads into revenue.

  • Reach: low. Only small share of customers have these long conversion cycles
  • Impact: high. Customers will be able to sustain their advertising level or maybe even increase it.
  • Confidence: high. We have reasonable confidence, that feature would be valuable for customers.
  • Effort: low-high. Depends on how we implement this – just via delaying payment from customers, or via partnering with banks and letting them handle the credit risks, while we get our revenue immediately

Option 2. Advertise now, pay later: constant arrangement, where balance for all ads run this month is due next month. This option is best for customers with shorter cycle of converting leads into revenue (<1 month)

  • Reach: med. More customers would qualify, since shorter conversion cycles are natural for companies who do pay-per-click advertising in the first place
  • Impact: high. Customers will be able to sustain their advertising level or maybe even increase it.
  • Confidence: high. We have reasonable confidence, that feature would be valuable for customers.
  • Effort: low-med. We could also implement this in-house or via partnership with banks, but it would be easier to make arrangements with banks for this product. Both options would be easier to implement than product # 1 because it requires less credit risk exposure from FB or bank due to short term of the loan.

Option 3. “Donate to local business product”: businesses would be able to launch donation campaigns and make them visible to local audience. This product is a great fit for local businesses like restaurants or zoos that are struggling due legal limitations on their occupancy.

  • Reach: Low. Only select types of local retail businesses with brands powerful enough to attract donations
  • Impact: Med. Customers are not likely to collect significant amounts of money
  • Confidence: Low. We have low confidence that the feature will really be valuable to customers.
  • Effort: low. We already have the fundraising campaign feature, so it is not expected for this feature to need a lot of development.
As a product manager, I would choose Product # 2 because it has the highest reach, while also having high impact and confidence, and there are two different implementation paths (in-house or partnering with banks) so we choose the level of effort and internal risk that we can tolerate. Products # 1 and #3 do not have enough reach, and when it comes to product #3 it might not provide enough value to customers. In terms of direct revenue – none of the 3 products have it, but product # 2 has the highest impact of helping customers sustain and grow their advertising spend with FB which is in line with our corporate goals.
Step 6. Building a product
First of all, I would validate the hypothesis for customer need and value proposition of chosen product with customers – both with qualitative techniques (interview) and quantitative techniques (survey).
In parallel, i would validate the hypothesis of feasibility by investigating possibilities of partnering with banks. From the vantage point of our internal risks, the optimal way for this product to work is to transfer credit risk to banks, so that bank issues a revolving credit line to customer, and we still get our revenue immediately. In case customer does not pay, they deal directly with the bank. In this case, customers will have to pay fees/% to the bank. In case of in-house implementation (we just correct revenue later), we will put our revenue at risk and carry incremental costs due to time value of money. We can compensate for these risks and costs by also charging customers.
Second, after key hypothesis are validated, i would break down the product into user stories and validate them with customers – from key interactions all the way to usability using product prototype. User stories might include:
  • Pre-qualification for the product. To reduce operational load, we will pre-qualify customers ourselves and only extend the offer to apply to eligible customers.
  • Formal application: customers that pre-qualify and choose to apply, fill out and submit necessary forms. Ideally, the customer should be able to interface only with Facebook and not deal with the bank.
  • Facebook forwards applications to the bank, the bank makes a decision. 
  • Customer is notified about the decision. In both cases of positive/negative decision, there should be transparent communication and guidance on next steps.
  • Customer’s ad account at FB is credited with the money (according to their credit limit) and they can spend it on ads.
  • Customer pays balance for ad spend next month
After we have validated the hypothesis of customer need, product value, key features as described by user stories, and usability of the interface, we can move on to develop the product, and then launch it on a subset of target customers, while tracking performance and observing user behavior.
Since the product will not generate revenue by itself, key product metrics will be: 
  • share of qualified customers that actually applied for the product
  • share of applied customers who were approved for the product and starting using it
  • share of customers who opted out
  • FB ad spend of customers who use the product (relative to FB spend of similar customers who do not use the product, or relative to their previous spend history)
  • LTV of customers who use the product (relative to typical LTV for given customer type)
To summarize: 
We focused on customer segment of small and medium business Advertisers, and considered 3 product solutions to address the needs for advertising easier and allocating money to pay for advertising. We ultimately decided to implement product that allows customers to pay for ads with one month delay, accomodating their cycle of converting leads into revenue. Product addresses both needs because it takes friction out of the process and allows customers to generate revenue first, and then pay for FB ads. The product will not generate any direct revenue, however our hypothesis is that the product will help increase ad revenue and LTV of customers, as well as help them get make it through the COVID crisis.

Design a Financial Services for FB product

 

First, I’m going to try to understand the business situation and our objective in more details. Second, I will focus on defining the target user and brainstorming what problems we could solve for them. And third, I will generate solutions for these problems, prioritize them, and make a recommendation.”

 

Looking at FB Mission of Building communities and bringing people together , this can be one product which can fit into FB portfolio.

 

Assumption – This is not a standalone product but a part of FB product.

 

Business Objectives –

 

  • Increasing User engagement ‘
  • Increase new Users
  • Increase ad revenue

 

Looking at the community aspect I will recommend User engagement as a core objective to focus for this product.

 

User Types –

 

Two distinct segments and further classified as

 

1.Providing Financial services

 

  • Major Businesses
  • SMEs
  • Individual Financial advisors

 

2.Need Financial service advice/help

 

  • Major Businesses/Enterprises
  • SMEs
  • Individuals who need advice/help

 

From the user perspective looking at the Objective as well as taking advantage of the community aspect of FB , I will recommend to focus on Individual who needs financial advice.

 

 

User problems

 

  1. Does not know whom to trust to plan financial planning
  2. He needs to learn about Investing
  3. He is clueless and needs guidance to plan ahead
  4. Not much time to go to any person.
  5. No time to manage any aspect of Financial planning.

 

 

My suggestion is to focus on option 1 & 4 as rest can be achieved from other sources .Also with FB community we can aid build trust for our solution options.

 

Solutions -Rated ( 1-3 where 3 is good)

 

  1. Build service where users can find Financial advisors with rankings from ratings an reviews  (simplicity -3  , Value – 3 , Total 6 )
  2. Planners can be filtered by Fee only or % planners ( How they charge) ( S- 2,V-3-T5)
  3. Users can reach out and schedule time with advisor over FB itself integrating the calendar option. (s-2,V-3-T5)
  4. Users can connect as well have video call over messenger.(simplicity -3  , Value – 3 , Total 6 )
  5. User can provide rating

 

 

Recommendation – Go for option 1 & 3 with the rider that for Financial investors , these are user rated advisors and might use their resources to up their ratings and reviews.

 

 

Metrics

# Number of users who searched for financial advisors

#People connected

#Users who rated the financial advisors

#New users added due to this service

#Monthly engagement between advisor and users.